Most firms don't have a clear picture of how their technology compares to peers, what industry standards expect, or where the next material risk sits. We deliver structured gap assessments — security, IT operations, compliance, cloud, app dev — that tell you what's good, what's not, and what to fix in what order.
Nobody knows what's ready and what isn't. Going in blind.
Underwriting questionnaire flagged things we didn't even know were issues.
Nobody knows. No benchmark, no answer.
Two stacks, two postures, no clear path to combined state.
Where you actually are today. Systems, controls, costs, gaps. Not aspirational — observed.
How your posture compares to similar-sized firms in your industry. Concrete numbers.
Mapped to the framework that matters to your firm: NIST CSF, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOC 2, ITIL.
Each gap rated by likelihood and impact. Prioritized for remediation.
12-month plan to close the top gaps. Costed. Sequenced. With owners.
Board-ready slide deck plus written summary. We present in person or via Teams.
Most clients do one or two of these. Some do all five.
| Topic | What we look at | Standard duration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security posture | Identity, endpoints, network, cloud, awareness | — | 3 weeks |
| IT operations | Monitoring, patching, backup, asset, vendor | — | 3 weeks |
| Compliance readiness | SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI | — | 4 weeks |
| Cloud architecture | AWS / Azure / GCP / M365 design + cost | — | 3 weeks |
| App-dev maturity | Engineering practices, code quality, release process | — | 3 weeks |
Interviews, document review, read-only access to systems. Scope confirmed.
Findings collected by area. Technical scans where applicable. Peer benchmarks pulled.
Risk register populated. Gaps prioritized. Remediation roadmap drafted.
Executive presentation. Written report delivered. Board-ready deck. Q&A.
Average. Spread across critical, high, medium, low.
Issues that warrant immediate action. Most firms have a few.
To close the top gaps. Paced for realistic adoption.
Reports map to whichever framework you'll be audited on next.
“We were told our IT was 'fine.' Senator's gap assessment found 4 critical issues — including a backup setup that hadn't worked in 11 months. The CFO realized the cost of not knowing was much higher than the assessment fee.”
No — gap assessments are advisory, not certifying. We tell you the truth; we don't issue a report you can hand to a third party. Most clients do this before pursuing actual certification.
Almost always. External eyes catch what internal habit normalizes. Our worst engagement found 47 issues; our best found 12.
Optional. Many clients have us scope and run the remediation. Others use the report to direct their own team or another partner.
Yes. Most clients start with one (usually security or compliance). Some come back for others later.
Tell us where you're concerned. We'll propose which gap assessment fits, what the fixed fee is, and what you'd see in 30 days.